File #: 16-6427    Name: Oral Report on the Fire Station Optiman Location Study
Type: Oral Report Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 4/20/2017 In control: City Council Legislative Meeting
On agenda: 5/23/2017 Final action:
Title: Oral Report on the Fire Station Optimal Location Study.
Attachments: 1. 16-6427_Attachment 1. Report, 2. 16-6427_Presentation: Fire Station Location
City of Alexandria, Virginia
________________

MEMORANDUM



DATE: MAY 17, 2017

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL

FROM: MARK B. JINKS, CITY MANAGER /s/

DOCKET TITLE:
Title
Oral Report on the Fire Station Optimal Location Study.
Body
_________________________________________________________________

ISSUE: Results of the Fire Station Optimal Location Study.

RECOMMENDATION: That City Council receive the results of the Fire Station Optimal Location Study.

BACKGROUND: Due to the sizable cost of planned fire station investments over the next decade, the City Manager asked an analysis team to study this station capital investment plan. The analysis team included members of the Office of Performance and Accountability (OPA), the Department of Information Technology Services (ITS) Geographic Information System (GIS) Division, and the Alexandria Fire Department.

This study's goal was to determine optimal locations for fire stations before substantial investments were made in existing or new stations. This report should not be interpreted as recommending that any particular fire station be moved. Rather this study identifies optimal locations. Such recommendations would only occur after further analysis, community dialogue and engagement, as well as the identification of specific, available receiving sites.

DISCUSSION: This study focused on four possible configurations: current stations; prior CIP configuration (which included proposed Station 211, which was added as part of the Beauregard Small Area Plan process in part as a reaction to BRAC traffic concerns); and two optimized scenarios. The study found that the addition of Station 211 was not needed. Therefore, the FY 2018 to FY 2027 CIP did not propose nor include when adopted funding for Station 211.

From a travel time perspective, all considered scenarios provide a reasonable level ...

Click here for full text