Title
Development Special Use Permit #2025-10023 - Landbay G, Block B/E
Development Special Use Permit #2025-10024 - Landbay G, Block G
Development Special Use Permit #2025-10025 - Landbay H
Encroachment #2025-00008
2901 and 2601 Main Line Boulevard, 2900 Potomac Avenue, and 601 E Glebe Road - Potomac Yard Landbays G & H
Public Hearing and consideration of requests for: (A) Development Special Use Permit and Site Plan with modifications to construct a multi-unit residential building [KJ1][CB2]with publicly accessible open space and ground floor retail, and Special Use Permit requests for more than three rooftop penthouses and a parking reduction for Landbay G, Blocks B and E; (B) a Development Special Use Permit and Site Plan with modifications to construct a multi-unit residential building, and a Special Use Permit request for a parking reduction for Landbay G, Block G; and (C) a Development Special Use Permit and Site Plan to construct townhomes with publicly accessible open space, and a Special Use Permit request for lots without frontage per Section 7-1007 of the Zoning Ordinance for Landbay H; and (D) an Encroachment into the public right-of-way for upper floor residential balconies for Landbay G, Block B/E; zoned CDD#10/Coordinated Development District #10.
Applicants: MTV Holdco, L.L.C., Wesley Housing Development Corporation, & Toll Mid-Atlantic LP Company, Inc., represented by M. Catharine Puskar, Attorney
[KJ1]Christina - I'm in the process of updating our notice templates with consistent case descriptions. Here's an example where I used the language in the ZO "multi-unit residential dwelling" but Planners want to use "mixed-use residential building" or "multi-unit residential building". I don't think either description is technically wrong, except that my suggestion should just read "multi-unit dwelling" since residential dwelling is redundant. Aside from that, do you have a preference for the legal notice - the ZO description "multi-unit dwelling" ...
Click here for full text